BRANMOOR
THURSDAY · 14 MAY 2026

Denial Reason Atlas

Denial rates by CPT, payer, and state.
With what happens when you appeal.

For any CPT code and commercial payer, surface the actual denial rate, the modal reason code, and the overturn rate on first-level appeal. The data exists — in state-mandated disclosures, TiC files, and the No Surprises Act IDR portal. Nobody has cross-referenced them. Until now.

Institutional license. Sold per engagement.

What the Atlas surfaces

For any CPT code × payer × state combination, the Atlas returns: denial rate, modal denial reason code (CARC), and overturn rate on first-level appeal. It is built by cross-referencing four primary sources that no one has joined at scale.

CPT Code Payer State Denial Rate Modal CARC Overturn Rate Sample
27447 (TKA) Aetna California 18.4% 197 — Prior auth required 63% 412 claims
27447 (TKA) UnitedHealthcare California 4.1% 50 — Non-covered service 31% 1,204 claims
99215 (Office visit) Anthem New York 6.8% 4 — Service inconsistent with diagnosis 44% 8,741 claims
43239 (Upper endoscopy) Cigna Texas 11.2% 197 — Prior auth required 78% 673 claims
93306 (Echocardiogram) Humana Florida 9.7% 96 — Non-covered charge 52% 2,311 claims
70553 (MRI Brain w/ contrast) BlueCross NC North Carolina 22.9% 197 — Prior auth required 71% 891 claims

Sample data from states with mandatory denial-rate disclosure. Confidence bands available per cell. Coverage is uneven by state — the methodology page lists which states have full, partial, or no coverage.

Why this data doesn't exist anywhere else

Payers don't publish denial rates by CPT code. Hospitals collect denial reason codes in 835 transactions but don't share them publicly. The signal becomes visible only by cross-referencing four sources:

State denial-rate disclosures

California, New York, Colorado, Washington, and a growing list require payers to disclose aggregate denial rates. Different formats, different granularity — Branmoor normalizes them.

CMS Transparency in Coverage

Allowed-amount files contain out-of-network payment records that imply denial patterns. The inference requires statistical methods; the source is public.

No Surprises Act IDR data

The federal independent dispute resolution portal publishes outcome data — which payer, which code, which result. Every IDR outcome is a de facto denial with a decision on the merits.

State insurance complaint data

State insurance departments publish consumer appeal data, often with outcome. Methodology varies by state; coverage and confidence are disclosed per cell.

Who buys it

Revenue Cycle Directors

Know which denials are worth working before you assign the staff. A 71% overturn rate on first-level appeal is a different prioritization than 22%. Stop working denials by payer; work them by payer × code × overturn probability.

RCM Service Companies

R1, Conifer, Ensemble, Optum360 — the Atlas is a productivity multiplier for the denial management teams you staff. Appeal brief templates built on the arguments that actually work against each payer.

Healthcare M&A Diligence

Underwriting an RCM-intensive target? The denial rate by payer tells you how much of the revenue cycle is structurally at risk. One metric that doesn't exist in any sell-side model.

Primary data sources

SourceWhat it providesCoverage
State-mandated denial-rate disclosures Aggregate denial rates by payer where required CA, NY, CO, WA + growing list
CMS Transparency in Coverage Out-of-network allowed-amount records All commercial payers nationally
No Surprises Act IDR Public Use Files IDR outcomes by payer and service Federal — all states
State insurance department complaint data Consumer-filed appeal data with outcomes Varies by state
CMS Marketplace appeals data ACA plan appeal outcomes by issuer Federal — ACA plans

Inquire about access

Denial Reason Atlas is sold under named institutional license, scoped per engagement. Reach out with your organization, role, and the CPT codes and payers you care about most.

Email [email protected]

‹ All Branmoor products